Afrikan Journal for Pan‑Vitalism and Social Phenomena (JPVSP)

Editorial policy, ethics, and peer‑review workflow designed to uphold scholarly rigor rooted in Afrikan cosmologies, community accountability, and plural epistemologies.

Double‑blind review Ethics & integrity Open science options Afrikan knowledge systems

Vision and scope

JPVSP advances scholarship on Pan‑Vitalism and social phenomena across Afrikan contexts, emphasizing vitality ontology, relational ethics, institutional practice, policy translation, and community impact. The journal welcomes work that bridges theory and application, formal modeling, and interdisciplinary methods spanning social sciences, philosophy, systems analysis, and community‑based research.

Core lens: Vital relations, interdependence, and agency across human, ecological, and spiritual domains.
Domains: Institutional governance, policy design, education, food sovereignty, sustainable development, cultural transmission, and intangible heritage.
Methods: Philosophical synthesis, qualitative/quantitative studies, formal systems modeling, comparative epistemologies, and applied case research.
Geographies: Continental Afrikan and Diasporic contexts, with attention to local languages and community frameworks.

Article types

Research articles

Length: 6,000–10,000 words including references and notes.
Content: Original empirical, theoretical, or formal modeling contributions.
Requirements: Clear methodology, ethics statement, data/appendix where applicable.

Short reports

Length: 2,500–4,000 words.
Content: Focused findings, pilot studies, methods notes, or model briefs.
Speed: Expedited review for time‑sensitive community or policy relevance.

Policy and practice

Length: 3,500–6,000 words.
Content: Case studies, policy designs, institutional frameworks, impact evaluations.
Stakeholders: Co‑authorship with community or institutional partners encouraged.

Perspectives & dialogues

Length: 1,800–3,000 words.
Content: Concept pieces, debates, interviews, annotated translations.
Scope: Bridging Afrikan cosmologies with contemporary theory and practice.

Special sections

Themed issues: Curated calls led by guest editors with clear community or policy relevance.
Methods & models: Formalization notes, reproducible frameworks, and evaluation criteria.
Community knowledge: Protocols for co‑production, consent, and benefit sharing.

Ethics and integrity

Human subjects: Ethics approvals, informed consent, data sovereignty, and risk mitigation are required for applicable studies.
Community engagement: Respect protocols, co‑authorship where appropriate, and transparent benefit sharing; avoid extractive practices.
Conflicts of interest: All authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose financial, institutional, and relational conflicts.
Authorship: Contribution transparency; acknowledgement of community collaborators and traditional knowledge holders.
Integrity: No plagiarism, image/data manipulation, or duplicate submission; adherence to research reproducibility and honest reporting.
Corrections: Clear policies for errata, expressions of concern, and retractions with public notices.

Editorial independence: Decisions are based solely on scholarly merit, methodological rigor, and relevance to JPVSP scope.

Peer‑review policy

Model: Double‑blind peer review; identities of authors and reviewers are concealed during evaluation.
Reviewer selection: Subject expertise, methodological fit, regional knowledge, and conflict screening.
Evaluation criteria: Originality, rigor, clarity, ethical integrity, relevance to Afrikan contexts, and contribution to Pan‑Vitalism.
Timelines: Target 4–6 weeks for standard articles; 2–4 weeks for short reports and policy notes.
Decisions: Accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject; detailed guidance accompanies all decisions.
Transparency options: Authors may opt to publish peer‑review histories post‑acceptance; reviewers may sign reviews if they choose after decision.

Peer‑review flowchart

1. Submission

Author submits manuscript, ethics statement, and disclosures.

→

2. Admin screening

Format check, scope fit, ethics/compliance pre‑screen.

→

3. Editor triage

Desk decision or send to review; conflict check.

→

4. Reviewer assignment

2–3 experts; double‑blind setup and timelines.

→

5. Review

Assess rigor, ethics, contribution, clarity, relevance.

→

6. Decision

Accept / minor / major revisions / reject.

7. Revisions

Author responds to reviews with tracked changes and rebuttal letter.

→

8. Re‑review (if needed)

Targeted check by editor or original reviewers.

→

9. Acceptance

Final decision and author options for transparency of review history.

→

10. Production

Copy‑editing, proofs, metadata, and licensing.

→

11. Publication

Online release; indexing; post‑publication dialogue.

Escalation paths

Ethics concerns, appeals, or conflict management handled by Editor‑in‑Chief with advisory panel.

Note: Timelines may adjust for complex methods or community protocols; editors provide updates throughout the process.

Editorial decisions and appeals

Desk decisions: Triage reserves capacity for fit and quality; constructive feedback provided where possible.
Appeals: Substantive methodological or factual grounds only; reviewed by an independent editor or advisory committee.
Complaints: Formal route for ethics, bias, or conflict concerns; documented and responded within defined timelines.
Reviewer conduct: Confidentiality, specificity, and respect; no ad hominem or culturally dismissive commentary.

Data, materials, and open science

Availability: Share data, code, and materials where feasible; respect community data sovereignty and sensitive content.
Repositories: Use trusted archives; include persistent identifiers and access statements.
Reproducibility: Provide methodological detail, model specifications, and versioning; appendices for formalism and proofs.
Preprints: Allowed; disclose preprint DOI; peer review remains independent of preprint visibility.
Licensing: Recommend open licenses compatible with community protections; authors retain rights with appropriate grants to JPVSP.

Diversity, language, and inclusion

Language: English primary; multilingual abstracts encouraged; terminologies from Afrikan languages welcomed with definitions.
Inclusion: Prioritize representation across regions, institutions, and knowledge traditions in authorship and reviewing.
Accessibility: Plain‑language summaries and community‑facing briefs encouraged for accepted articles.
Bias mitigation: Training for editors and reviewers on epistemic pluralism and respectful critique.

Governance and responsibilities

Editorial board: Sets policy, ensures integrity, and oversees themed issues and strategic partnerships.
Editor‑in‑Chief: Final responsibility for decisions, escalations, and independence from external interests.
Managing editor: Workflow coordination, timelines, and production quality.
Advisory panel: Community and methodological counsel; supports appeals and complex ethics cases.

Version 1.0 — This policy is living and will be iterated with community and scholarly feedback.